Electronics Questions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
#20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as <math>R_L</math> gets smaller? |
#20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as <math>R_L</math> gets smaller? |
||
#21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires? |
#21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires? |
||
#31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier? |
|||
Revision as of 17:40, 5 January 2010
Format: Page, Paragraph, Line.
Chapter 1
- 20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as gets smaller?
- 21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
- 31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?
