Integrator Amplifier - Revision history

Benjamin.henry: /* Reviewers */

2010-01-28T17:39:46Z

Reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 28 January 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Reviewers==		==Reviewers==
	[[Greg Fong]]		[[Greg Fong]]
	*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_article_does_not_cite_any_references_or_sources.#Footnote_system
	*I don't think I would capitalize amplifier, differentiator , differentiate, integrator or resistor.
	*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.
	*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.

	[[Shepherd,Victor]]		[[Shepherd,Victor]]

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>

Victor.shepherd: /* Reviewers */

2010-01-27T18:16:39Z

Reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 27 January 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.		*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.
	*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.		*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.
	[[Shepherd, Victor]]
			[[Shepherd,Victor]]

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>

Victor.shepherd: /* Reviewers */

2010-01-27T18:15:52Z

Reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 27 January 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.		*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.
	*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.		*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.
			[[Shepherd, Victor]]
	Victor ~~Shepherd~~

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>

Victor.shepherd: /* Reviewers */

2010-01-27T18:15:00Z

Reviewers

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 27 January 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Victor Shepherd		Victor Shepherd
	*I agree with Greg just like you did with square sine wave do the same with triangle wave instead of ^^^, makes it confusing and I don't believe that's a standard way of representing it.
	*I will add one more thing. You don't need to have the types of waves within "".

	==Sources==		==Sources==
	<references/>		<references/>

Benjamin.henry at 03:24, 18 January 2010

2010-01-18T03:24:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 17 January 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The use of an integrator circuit is the opposite of a differentiator circuit. In other words, If you have a triangle wave input and you differentiate it you will get a square wave output. If you run the square wave as the input to an integrator circuit you will end up with the triangle wave for the output<ref><sup>Scherz, P: ''Practical Electronics for Inventors 2nd ed'', page 545. </sup></ref>.		The use of an integrator circuit is the opposite of a differentiator circuit. In other words, If you have a triangle wave input and you differentiate it you will get a square wave output. If you run the square wave as the input to an integrator circuit you will end up with the triangle wave for the output<ref><sup>Scherz, P: ''Practical Electronics for Inventors 2nd ed'', page 545. </sup></ref>.
	The resistor (<math>R_{2}</math>) is used to provide feedback<ref><sup>[[Feedback_in_Amplifiers]]</sup></ref> of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.		The resistor (<math>R_{2}</math>) is used to provide feedback<ref><sup>[[Feedback_in_Amplifiers]]</sup></ref>. of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.

	==Contributers==		==Contributers==

Benjamin.henry: fixed sources likes and cited material

2010-01-18T03:19:53Z

fixed sources likes and cited material

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 17 January 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	</math>		</math>

	"<math>R_{2}</math> ; Provides negative feedback for low output impedance needs. But it also distorts the output."<sup>1</sup>		"<math>R_{2}</math> ; Provides negative feedback for low output impedance needs. But it also distorts the output."<ref><sup>Quick Study "Electronics 1, Part 2"</sup></ref>

	The use of an integrator circuit is the opposite of a differentiator circuit. In other words, If you have a triangle wave input and you differentiate it you will get a square wave output. If you run the square wave as the input to an integrator circuit you will end up with the triangle wave for the output<sup>2</sup>.		The use of an integrator circuit is the opposite of a differentiator circuit. In other words, If you have a triangle wave input and you differentiate it you will get a square wave output. If you run the square wave as the input to an integrator circuit you will end up with the triangle wave for the output<ref><sup>Scherz, P: ''Practical Electronics for Inventors 2nd ed'', page 545. </sup></ref>.
	The resistor (<math>R_{2}</math>) is used to provide feedback<sup>3</sup> of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.		The resistor (<math>R_{2}</math>) is used to provide feedback<ref><sup>[[Feedback_in_Amplifiers]]</sup></ref> of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.

	==Contributers==		==Contributers==
Line 30:		Line 30:

	==Sources==		==Sources==
			<references/>
	~~<sup>1</sup> Quick Study "Electronics 1, Part 2"~~

	~~<sup>2</sup> Practical Electronics for Inventors (p545, 2nd edition)~~

	~~<sup>3~~</~~sup~~> ~~[[Feedback_in_Amplifiers]]~~

Benjamin.henry at 21:55, 13 January 2010

2010-01-13T21:55:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 13 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	===Integrator ===		===Integrator ===
	[[Image:Integrator_ben.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|right\|Graph of a typical Integrator Amp circuit (drawing redrawn by Ben Henry)]]		[[Image:Integrator_ben.jpg\|200px\|thumb\|right\|Graph of a typical Integrator Amp circuit (drawing redrawn by Ben Henry)]]
	The circuit at right integrates the input voltage <math>V_{in}</math> by using an ~~Amplifier~~.		The circuit at right integrates the input voltage <math>V_{in}</math> by using an amplifier.

	<math>V_{out} = \frac{-1}{R_{1}*C}\int V_{in} dt		<math>V_{out} = \frac{-1}{R_{1}*C}\int V_{in} dt
Line 11:		Line 11:
	"<math>R_{2}</math> ; Provides negative feedback for low output impedance needs. But it also distorts the output."<sup>1</sup>		"<math>R_{2}</math> ; Provides negative feedback for low output impedance needs. But it also distorts the output."<sup>1</sup>

	The use of an ~~Integrator~~ circuit is the opposite of a ~~Differentiator~~ circuit. In other words, If you have a ~~"^^^" style~~ input and you ~~Differentiate~~ it you will get a "square ~~sine~~ wave" output. If you run the "square ~~sine~~ wave" as the input to an ~~Integrator~~ circuit you will end up with the ~~"^^^"~~ for the output<sup>2</sup>.		The use of an integrator circuit is the opposite of a differentiator circuit. In other words, If you have a triangle wave input and you differentiate it you will get a square wave output. If you run the square wave as the input to an integrator circuit you will end up with the triangle wave for the output<sup>2</sup>.
	The ~~Resistor~~ (<math>R_{2}</math>) Is used to provide feedback<sup>3</sup> of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.		The resistor (<math>R_{2}</math>) is used to provide feedback<sup>3</sup> of the output DC voltage. Without this, circuit wouldn't perform as calculated because of the un-ideal conditions of real life.

	==Contributers==		==Contributers==
Line 18:		Line 18:
	--[[User:Benjamin.henry\|Benjamin.henry]] 23:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Benjamin.henry\|Benjamin.henry]] 23:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

	==~~Readers~~==		==Reviewers==
	[[Greg Fong]]		[[Greg Fong]]
	*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_article_does_not_cite_any_references_or_sources.#Footnote_system		*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_article_does_not_cite_any_references_or_sources.#Footnote_system

Victor.shepherd: /* Readers */

2010-01-13T17:17:53Z

Readers

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:17, 13 January 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.		*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.

	~~[[Greg Fong]]~~		Victor Shepherd
	I agree with Greg just like you did with square sine wave do the same with triangle wave instead of ^^^, makes it confusing and I don't believe that's a standard way of representing it.		*I agree with Greg just like you did with square sine wave do the same with triangle wave instead of ^^^, makes it confusing and I don't believe that's a standard way of representing it.
	*I will add one more thing. You don't need to have the types of waves within "".		*I will add one more thing. You don't need to have the types of waves within "".

Victor.shepherd: /* Readers */

2010-01-13T17:14:33Z

Readers

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 13 January 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.		*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.
	*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.		*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.

			[[Greg Fong]]
			I agree with Greg just like you did with square sine wave do the same with triangle wave instead of ^^^, makes it confusing and I don't believe that's a standard way of representing it.
			*I will add one more thing. You don't need to have the types of waves within "".

	==Sources==		==Sources==

Fonggr: /* Readers */

2010-01-13T07:56:25Z

Readers

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 13 January 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*I don't think I would capitalize amplifier, differentiator , differentiate, integrator or resistor.		*I don't think I would capitalize amplifier, differentiator , differentiate, integrator or resistor.
	*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.		*I believe you mean triangle wave and square wave, in place of ^^^ and square sine wave.
			*After you take these comments into consideration, email me again and I'll take a look at it once more.

	==Sources==		==Sources==