10/01 - Vectors & Functions: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
<math> f(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \cdot \delta (t - u)\, du </math>
<math> f(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \cdot \delta (t - u)\, du </math>


==Changing from one orthogonal Basis Functions to another==
==Changing from one orthogonal basis set to another==
We have a vector <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \hat a_j </math> and wish to change it to <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j </math>. We know each basis set, and their relationship to each other. We are trying to find the coefficients, (the <math> b_j \,\!</math>) that go with the new basis set.
*Working from the <math> \hat a </math> basis set:
:<math>\hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \underbrace{\left (\hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat a_j on \hat b_m} </math>
*Working from the <math> \hat b </math> basis set:
:<math> \hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \underbrace{\left (\hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat b_j on \hat b_m}= \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j k_m \delta mj = k_m \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \delta mj= b_m k_m \sum_{j=1}^3 = b_m k_m </math>
*Now taking the <math> \hat v \cdot \hat b_m </math> that was derived from both basis sets and equating them:
:<math> b_m k_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \Longrightarrow b_m = \frac{1}{k_m} \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \left (\hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \right ) </math>


==Defining <math> k_m \,\! </math>==
*explain b_j
Taking <math> k_m \,\! </math> from the previous section:
:<math> \hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m = k_m \delta mj \Longrightarrow \hat b_m \cdot \hat b_m = k_m \Longrightarrow \left | \hat b_m \right |^2 = k_m </math>

Thus <math> k_m \,\! </math> is the length of <math>\hat b_m</math> squared

==Questions==
*What does the <math> \hat b_m </math> represent, say compared to <math> \hat b_j</math>?
**<math> \hat b_m </math> is a unit vector in the direction we're interested in finding the new coefficient for the new basis set -- rewrite this
**<math> \hat b_j </math> is a unit vector for one direction in our new basis set
*When you do the dot product of say <math>\vec A \cdot \vec B</math>, is it always the projection of <math>\vec A</math> onto <math>\vec B</math> and not the opposite way around?
**<math>\vec A \cdot \vec B = \left | \vec A \right | \left | \vec B \right | \cos \theta </math>
*Then is the picture assuming something is a unit vector?
**You will have to choose whether you're interested in projecting A onto B or B onto A. The lengths will be the same, but the direction will be different.
*Why did you decide to make it <math>k_m \,\!</math> instead of <math>k_j\,\!</math>?
**Completely arbitrary, the end result is the same either way
*<math> \hat x </math> is a unit vector and <math> \vec x </math> is a vector

Latest revision as of 19:15, 11 November 2008

Vectors & Functions

  • How to related the vector v to the sampling?

We could sample a continuous function every T seconds, creating a "bar graph".

  • Where is a rectangle 1 unit high and T units wide

In an effort to make this more exact, will will continue to shrink the rectangle down to the Dirac Delta function,

By using the Dirac Delta function the summation becomes an integral

Changing from one orthogonal basis set to another

We have a vector and wish to change it to . We know each basis set, and their relationship to each other. We are trying to find the coefficients, (the ) that go with the new basis set.

  • Working from the basis set:
  • Working from the basis set:
  • Now taking the that was derived from both basis sets and equating them:

Defining

Taking from the previous section:

Thus is the length of squared

Questions

  • What does the represent, say compared to ?
    • is a unit vector in the direction we're interested in finding the new coefficient for the new basis set -- rewrite this
    • is a unit vector for one direction in our new basis set
  • When you do the dot product of say , is it always the projection of onto and not the opposite way around?
  • Then is the picture assuming something is a unit vector?
    • You will have to choose whether you're interested in projecting A onto B or B onto A. The lengths will be the same, but the direction will be different.
  • Why did you decide to make it instead of ?
    • Completely arbitrary, the end result is the same either way
  • is a unit vector and is a vector