10/01 - Vectors & Functions: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
<math> f(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \cdot \delta (t - u)\, du </math>
<math> f(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(u) \cdot \delta (t - u)\, du </math>


==Changing from one orthogonal Basis Functions to another==
==Changing from one orthogonal basis set to another==
If you have a vector <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \hat a_j </math> and wish to change it to <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j</math>
We have a vector <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \hat a_j </math> and wish to change it to <math> \hat v = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j </math>. We know each basis set, and their relationship to each other. We are trying to find the coefficients, (the <math> b_j \,\!</math>) that go with the new basis set.
*Working from the <math> \hat a </math> basis set:
*Working from the <math> \hat a </math> basis set:
:<math>\hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \underbrace{\left (\hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat a_j on \hat b_m} </math>
:<math>\hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \underbrace{\left (\hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat a_j on \hat b_m} </math>
*Working from the <math> \hat b </math> basis set:
*Working from the <math> \hat b </math> basis set:
<math> \hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \underbrace{\left (\hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat b_j on \hat b_m}= \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j k_m \delta mj = k_m \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \delta mj= \sum_{j=1}^3 a_m k_m</math>
:<math> \hat v \cdot \hat b_m= \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \underbrace{\left (\hat b_j \cdot \hat b_m \right )}_{proj of \hat b_j on \hat b_m}= \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j k_m \delta mj = k_m \sum_{j=1}^3 b_j \delta mj= b_m k_m \sum_{j=1}^3 = b_m k_m </math>
*Now taking the <math> \hat v \cdot \hat b_m </math> that was derived from both basis sets and equating them:
:<math> b_m k_m = \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \Longrightarrow b_m = \frac{1}{k_m} \sum_{j=1}^3 v_j \left (\hat a_j \cdot \hat b_m \right ) </math>

==Defining <math> k_m \c\! </math>
Define <math> k_m = \left | \hat a_m \right |^2 </math>
Define <math> k_m = \left | \hat a_m \right |^2 </math>
*Why?
*How did you get the last two lines of the last page?
*How did you get the last two lines of the last page?
*What does the <math> \hat b_m </math> represent, say compared to <math> \hat b_j</math>?
*What does the <math> \hat b_m </math> represent, say compared to <math> \hat b_j</math>?
*When you do the dot product of say A \cdot B, is it always the projection of A onto B and not the opposite way around?
*When you do the dot product of say A \cdot B, is it always the projection of A onto B and not the opposite way around?
*Why did you decide to make it k_m instead of k_j?

Revision as of 15:32, 10 November 2008

Vectors & Functions

  • How to related the vector v to the sampling?

We could sample a continuous function every T seconds, creating a "bar graph".

  • Where is a rectangle 1 unit high and T units wide

In an effort to make this more exact, will will continue to shrink the rectangle down to the Dirac Delta function,

By using the Dirac Delta function the summation becomes an integral

Changing from one orthogonal basis set to another

We have a vector and wish to change it to . We know each basis set, and their relationship to each other. We are trying to find the coefficients, (the ) that go with the new basis set.

  • Working from the basis set:
  • Working from the basis set:
  • Now taking the that was derived from both basis sets and equating them:

==Defining Failed to parse (unknown function "\c"): {\displaystyle k_m \c\! } Define

  • How did you get the last two lines of the last page?
  • What does the represent, say compared to ?
  • When you do the dot product of say A \cdot B, is it always the projection of A onto B and not the opposite way around?
  • Why did you decide to make it k_m instead of k_j?