Example problems of magnetic circuits: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Given:


A copper core with susceptibility <math> \chi_m = -9.7 \times 10^{-6} </math>


=Problem 1 Kevin Starkey=
length of core L = 1 m

Given a copper core with:

Susceptibility <math> \chi_m = -9.7 \times 10^{-6} </math>

Length of core L = 1 m


Gap length g = .01 m
Gap length g = .01 m


cross sectional area A = .1 m
Cross sectional area A = .1 m


current I = 10A
Current I = 10A


N = 5 turns
N = 5 turns
Line 15: Line 19:




Find: <math> B_g </math>
Find: <math> B_g </math> <br>
[[Image:EMEC1.png]]


Solution:
Solution:
Line 21: Line 26:
Which yeilds <math> \mu = 4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+-9.7 \times 10^{-6}) = 1.2566 \times 10^{-6} \frac{N}{A^2} </math> <br><br>
Which yeilds <math> \mu = 4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+-9.7 \times 10^{-6}) = 1.2566 \times 10^{-6} \frac{N}{A^2} </math> <br><br>


Now with this, the length and cross sectional area of the core we can solve for reluctance <math> R_c </math> by: <br>
Now using the length, cross sectional area, and permeability of the core we can solve for reluctance <math> R_c </math> by: <br>


<math> R_c = \frac{L}{\mu A} = \frac{1}{1.2566 \times 10^{-6}\times .1} = 7.96 \times 10^{6} </math> <br> <br>
<math> R_c = \frac{L}{\mu A} = \frac{1}{1.2566 \times 10^{-6}\times .1} = 7.96 \times 10^{6} </math> <br> <br>
Similarly to get the reluctance of the gap <br>
Similarly, to get the reluctance of the gap <br>


<math>R_g = \frac {g}{\mu_0 (\sqrt{A} + g)^2} = \frac {.01}{4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7} (\sqrt{.1} + .01)^2} = 74.8 \times 10^{3} </math> <br> <br>
<math>R_g = \frac {g}{\mu_0 (\sqrt{A} + g)^2} = \frac {.01}{4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7} (\sqrt{.1} + .01)^2} = 74.8 \times 10^{3} </math> <br> <br>


Now Using <math> B_g = \frac{NI}{(R_g R_c)((\sqrt{A} + g)^2} </math> <br>
Now recall the equation for the magnetic field of a gap as seen in class <math> B_g = \frac{NI}{(R_g R_c)((\sqrt{A} + g)^2} </math> <br>
Yields <math> B_g = \frac{5 \times 10}{74.8 \times 10^{3} \times 7.96 \times 10^{6} \times (\sqrt{.1} + .01)^2} = .789 \times 10^{-9}</math>
Yields <math> B_g = \frac{5 \times 10}{74.8 \times 10^{3} \times 7.96 \times 10^{6} \times (\sqrt{.1} + .01)^2} = .789 \times 10^{-9}</math> <br>
This is the magnetic field in the center of the gap due to the applied current




Line 35: Line 41:
----
----
[[Nick Christman]]:
[[Nick Christman]]:
* I would change "Given: ... A copper core with" to "Given a copper core with:" to make it a little more consistent or even take all the information you have and make it into a complete sentence/paragraph.
* I would change "Given: (...)[list] A copper core with..." to "Given a copper core with: [list]" to make it a little more consistent or even take all the information you have and make it into a complete sentence/paragraph.
* This looks strange to me, <math>\mu = 4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+-9.7 \times 10^{-6})</math> maybe make it <math>\mu = 4 \pi \times 10^{-7}(1-9.7 \times 10^{-6})</math> or <math>\mu = 4 \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+(-9.7 \times 10^{-6}))</math>
* This looks strange to me, <math>\mu = 4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+-9.7 \times 10^{-6})</math> maybe make it <math>\mu = 4 \pi \times 10^{-7}(1-9.7 \times 10^{-6})</math> or <math>\mu = 4 \pi \times 10^{-7}(1+(-9.7 \times 10^{-6}))</math>
* This sentence is kind of strange, "Now with this, the length and cross sectional area of the core we can solve for reluctance..." Maybe make it, "With the permeability, length, and cross sectional area of the copper core we can now solve for the reluctance..." Something like that might flow a little better."
* Below that, I think you need a comma after "Similarly."
* You might want to add some more words to the last two lines... Instead of saying "Now using..." say something like, "Recall that the equation for the magnetic field of the gap is..." or something to that effect.
* Lastly, you should think of some sort of conclusion... what exactly does this mean?

Latest revision as of 00:25, 11 January 2010


Problem 1 Kevin Starkey

Given a copper core with:

Susceptibility

Length of core L = 1 m

Gap length g = .01 m

Cross sectional area A = .1 m

Current I = 10A

N = 5 turns


Find:
EMEC1.png

Solution: First we need to find the permeability of copper given by the equation


Which yeilds

Now using the length, cross sectional area, and permeability of the core we can solve for reluctance by:



Similarly, to get the reluctance of the gap



Now recall the equation for the magnetic field of a gap as seen in class
Yields
This is the magnetic field in the center of the gap due to the applied current


Reviewers:


Nick Christman:

  • I would change "Given: (...)[list] A copper core with..." to "Given a copper core with: [list]" to make it a little more consistent or even take all the information you have and make it into a complete sentence/paragraph.
  • This looks strange to me, maybe make it or
  • This sentence is kind of strange, "Now with this, the length and cross sectional area of the core we can solve for reluctance..." Maybe make it, "With the permeability, length, and cross sectional area of the copper core we can now solve for the reluctance..." Something like that might flow a little better."
  • Below that, I think you need a comma after "Similarly."
  • You might want to add some more words to the last two lines... Instead of saying "Now using..." say something like, "Recall that the equation for the magnetic field of the gap is..." or something to that effect.
  • Lastly, you should think of some sort of conclusion... what exactly does this mean?