Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>


But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore,
Now let's make the following substitution <math> \displaystyle \theta = f-f_{0}</math>

This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:

<math>
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi \theta t} \,dt
</math>
<br/>

This looks just like <math> \displaystyle G(\theta )</math>!

We can now conclude that:
<br/>
<br/>


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(\theta ) = G(f-f_{0})
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>


**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE'''

<br/>
<br/>

2. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right]</math><br/>'''

-- Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
<br/>


By definition we know that:
2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:


<math>
<math>
Line 63: Line 83:


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>
Line 72: Line 92:


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt
</math>
</math>


After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:


<math>
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt
</math>


Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get:

<math>
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt = e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } \,dt \right]
</math>

We know that the exponential in terms of <math>\displaystyle t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get:


<math>
<math>
Line 85: Line 113:
</math>
</math>


<br/>
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****

'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE'''

<br/>
<br/>


----
----

Revision as of 15:35, 31 October 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now

Note that

So

-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

Combining terms, we get:


Now let's make the following substitution

This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:


This looks just like !

We can now conclude that:



PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE



2. Find

-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...

By definition we know that:

Rearranging terms we get:


Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:

We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:


PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE




Joshua Sarris

Find


Recall ,

so expanding we have,


Also recall ,

so we can convert to exponentials.


Now integrating gives us,



So we now have the identity,

or rather

Reviewed by Max