Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>


"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is to consider add one more step, showing the delta function in the integral -- it isn't necessary, but it helps the proof/identity flow a little better. Good job!"
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral -- it isn't necessary, but it helps the proof/identity flow a little better. Good job!"


Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]

Revision as of 15:40, 31 October 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now

Note that

So

"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral -- it isn't necessary, but it helps the proof/identity flow a little better. Good job!"

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

Combining terms, we get:


Now let's make the following substitution

This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:


This looks just like !

We can now conclude that:



PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE



2. Find

-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...

By definition we know that:

Rearranging terms we get:


Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:

We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:


PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE




Joshua Sarris

Find


Recall ,

so expanding we have,


Also recall ,

so we can convert to exponentials.


Now integrating gives us,



So we now have the identity,

or rather

Reviewed by Max