Fourier series - by Ray Betz: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
==Linear Systems==
==Linear Systems==


Let us say we have a Linear time Invarient System, where <math> x(t) </math> is the input and <math> y(t) </math> is the output. What outputs do we get as we put different inputs into this system?
Let us say we have a linear time invarient system, where <math> x(t) </math> is the input and <math> y(t) </math> is the output. What outputs do we get as we put different inputs into this system?
[[Image:Linear_System.JPG]]


If we put in an impulse response, <math> \delta(t)</math>, then we get out <math>h(t)</math>. What would happen if we put a time delayed impulse signal (<math> \delta(t-u)</math>) into the system. The output response would be a time delayed <math>h(t)</math>, or <math>h(t-u)</math>, because the system is time invarient. So, no matter when we put in our signal the response would come out the same.
[[Image:system.jpg]]


What if we now multiplied our impulse by a coefficient? Since our system is linear the proportionality property applies. If we put <math> x(u)\delta(t-u)</math> into our system then we should get out <math>x(u)h(t-u)</math>.
{| style="width:400px; height:200px" border="1"

By the superposition property(because we have a linear system) we may take the integral of <math> x(u)\delta(t-u)</math> and we get out <math> \int_{-\infty}^\infty x(u)h(t-u) du</math>. What would we get if we put <math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} </math> into our system. We could find out by plugging <math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} </math> in for <math> x(u) </math> in the integral that we just found the output for above. If we do a change of variables (<math> v = t-u, and dv = -du </math>) we get <math> \int_{-\infty}^\infty x(u)h(t-u) du</math>. By pulling <math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} </math> out of the integral and calling the remaining integral <math> B_k </math> we get <math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} B_k</math>.




{| style="width:600px; height:100px" border="1"
|-
|-
| '''INPUT'''
| abc
| '''OUTPUT'''
| def
| '''REASON'''
| ghi
|-
|- style="height:100px"
| <math> \delta(t)</math>
| jkl
| <math>h(t)</math>
| style="width:200px" |mno
| pqr
| Given
|-
|-
| <math> \delta(t-u)</math>
| stu
| <math>h(t-u)</math>
| vwx
| Time Invarient
| yz
|-
| <math> x(u)\delta(t-u)</math>
| <math>x(u)h(t-u)</math>
| Proportionality
|-
|<math> \int_{-\infty}^\infty x(u)\delta(t-u) du</math>
|<math> \int_{-\infty}^\infty x(u)h(t-u) du</math>
|Superposition
|-
|<math> \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{j 2 \pi f t} h(t-u) du</math>
|<math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{j 2 \pi v t} h(v) dv</math>
|Superposition
|-
|<math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} </math>
|<math> e^{j 2 \pi f t} B_k</math>
|Superposition (from above)
|}
|}

'''INPUT''' '''OUTPUT''' '''REASON'''

<math> \delta(t)</math> <math>h(t)</math> Given


==Fourier Series (indepth)==
==Fourier Series (indepth)==

Revision as of 18:08, 25 October 2005

Fourier Series

If

  1. Dirichlet conditions are satisfied

then we can write

The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given , we may determine by taking the inner product of with . Let us assume a solution for of the form . Now we take the inner product of with .

If then,

If then,

We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation.

So, we may conclude

Orthogonal Functions

The function and are orthogonal on if and only if .

The set of functions are orthonormal if and only if .

Linear Systems

Let us say we have a linear time invarient system, where is the input and is the output. What outputs do we get as we put different inputs into this system? File:Linear System.JPG

If we put in an impulse response, , then we get out . What would happen if we put a time delayed impulse signal () into the system. The output response would be a time delayed , or , because the system is time invarient. So, no matter when we put in our signal the response would come out the same.

What if we now multiplied our impulse by a coefficient? Since our system is linear the proportionality property applies. If we put into our system then we should get out .

By the superposition property(because we have a linear system) we may take the integral of and we get out . What would we get if we put into our system. We could find out by plugging in for in the integral that we just found the output for above. If we do a change of variables () we get . By pulling out of the integral and calling the remaining integral we get .



INPUT OUTPUT REASON
Given
Time Invarient
Proportionality
Superposition
Superposition
Superposition (from above)

Fourier Series (indepth)

I would like to take a closer look at in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of .

We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where is negative, zero, and positive.

Now, by substituting into the summation where is negative and substituting into the summation where is positive we get:

Recall that

If is real, then . Let us assume that is real.

Recall that Here is further clarification on this property

So, we may write:

Fourier Transform

Fourier transforms emerge because we want to be able to make Fourier expressions of non-periodic functions. We can take the limit of those non-periodic functions to get a fourier expression for the function.

Remember that:


So,

From the above limit we define and .

We can take the derivitive of and then put in terms of the reverse fourier transform.

What happens if we just shift the time of ?

In the same way, if we shift the frequency we get:

What would be the Fourier transform of ?


<