|
|
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br> |
|
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br> |
|
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> |
|
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> |
|
|
|
|
|
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job! |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]] |
|
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]] |
Line 25: |
Line 27: |
|
|
|
|
|
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br> |
|
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br> |
|
|
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property. |
⚫ |
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_{0}} \,dt \right] </math><br/>''' |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0} t} \right] </math><br/>''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as ''complex modulation''<br/> |
|
To begin, we know that<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt |
⚫ |
= \ int_{ - \ infty}^{\ infty} \ left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} 10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right ) e^{-j2 \pi ft}\,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
⚫ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After some factoring and combinting of like terms we get:
|
|
Combining terms, we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|
|
⚫ |
\ mathcal{ F} \ left[ g(t)e^{ j2 \ pi f_{0}t} \ right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{ -j2 \pi ( f- f_{0}) t} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore, |
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0}) |
⚫ |
= \ int_{ - \ infty}^{\ infty} \ left( \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} 10^{t}g(t) \,dt \right) e^{j2 \pi f( t_0- t)}\,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE **** |
|
But recall that |
|
|
<math>\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2 \pi f(t_{0}-t)} \,dt \equiv \delta (t_{0}-t) \mbox{ or } \delta (t-t_{0})</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
Because of this definition (and some "math magic") our problem has been simplified significantly: <br/> |
|
|
⚫ |
\ mathcal{ F} \ left[ g(t-t_{0} )e^{ j2 \ pi f_{0}t} \ right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t -t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right ] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Rearranging terms we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t) \delta (t-t_{0})\,dt = 10^{t_0}g(t_0) |
|
⚫ |
|
|
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now lets make the substitution <math>\lambda = t-t_{0} \rightarrow t = \lambda + t_{0}</math>. |
|
Therefore, |
|
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
This leads us to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> \mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] = 10^{t_0}g(t_0) </math> |
|
|
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: |
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE **** |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
---- |
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
So
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
But this is simply . Therefore,
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
2. Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall
,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather
Reviewed by Max