|
|
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> |
|
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> |
|
|
|
|
|
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary, but it helps the proof/identity look more complete. Good job!" |
|
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!" |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: <math>\int_{a1}^{a2}\int_{b1}^{b2}X(s')Y(s'') \delta (s''-s') \,ds' \,ds'' = \int_{a1}^{a2}X(s')Y(s') \,ds' </math> |
|
Example: <math>\int_{a1}^{a2}\int_{b1}^{b2}X(s')Y(s'') \delta (s''-s') \,ds' \,ds'' = \int_{a1}^{a2}X(s')Y(s') \,ds' </math> |
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now Failed to parse (SVG with PNG fallback (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')e^{j2\pi f^'t}df^' \Bigg(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H(f^{''})e^{j2\pi f^{''}t}df^{''}\Bigg)^* dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt df^{''} df^' \!}
Note that
So
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"
Example:
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
Now let's make the following substitution
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:
This looks just like !
We can now conclude that:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
2. Find
-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
By definition we know that:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall
,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather
Reviewed by Max