|
|
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Show <math> \mathcal{F}\left[ \int_{- \infty}^{t} s(\lambda ) \,d\lambda \right] = \frac{S(F)}{j2 \pi f} \mbox{ if } S(0) = 0 </math> |
|
(a) Show <math> \mathcal{F}\left[ \int_{- \infty}^{t} s(\lambda ) \,d\lambda \right] = \frac{S(F)}{j2 \pi f} \mbox{ if } S(0) = 0 </math>. HINT: <math> S(0) = S(f) \LARGE | _{f=0}</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
Revision as of 15:11, 31 October 2009
Perform the following tasks:
Nick Christman
(a) Show . HINT: Failed to parse (unknown function "\LARGE"): {\displaystyle S(0) = S(f) \LARGE | _{f=0}}
(b)If can you find in terms of ?
(c) Do another property on the Wiki and get it reviewed (i.e. review a second property) -- Fourier Transform Properties
Find
-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
By definition we know that:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get: