6 - Fourier Transform 2: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New page: Reviewed Nicks 2nd Fourier transform made comment about one possible error other than that looked good
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
(a) Show <math> \mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{t} s(\lambda ) \,d\lambda \right]  = \frac{S(f)}{j2 \pi f} \mbox{ if } S(0) = 0 </math>. '''Hint''': <math> S(0) = S(f) | _{_{f=0}} = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} s(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f \rightarrow 0)t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} s(t) \,dt </math>
<br>
<br>
(b) If <math> S(0) \neq 0 </math> can you find <math> \mathcal{F}\left[ \int_{- \infty}^{t} s(\lambda ) \,d\lambda \right] </math> in terms of <math> \displaystyle S(0) </math>?
<br>
<br>
(c) Do another property on the Wiki and review a second property
Find <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] </math><br>
First <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} </math><br>
or rearranging we get <math> \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}s(t)e^{j2\pi t(f_0 -f)}dt</math><br>
Which leads to <math> \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}s(t)e^{j2\pi t(f_0 -f)}dt = S(f-f_0)</math><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] = S(f-f_0) </math><br><br>
Reviewed Nicks 2nd Fourier transform made comment about one possible error other than that looked good
Reviewed Nicks 2nd Fourier transform made comment about one possible error other than that looked good

Latest revision as of 22:31, 7 November 2009

(a) Show [ts(λ)dλ]=S(f)j2πf if S(0)=0. Hint: S(0)=S(f)|f=0=s(t)ej2π(f0)tdt=s(t)dt




(b) If S(0)0 can you find [ts(λ)dλ] in terms of S(0)?




(c) Do another property on the Wiki and review a second property

Find [ej2πf0ts(t)]
First [ej2πf0ts(t)]=ej2πf0ts(t)ej2πft
or rearranging we get ej2πf0ts(t)ej2πftdt=s(t)ej2πt(f0f)dt
Which leads to s(t)ej2πt(f0f)dt=S(ff0)
So [ej2πf0ts(t)]=S(ff0)


Reviewed Nicks 2nd Fourier transform made comment about one possible error other than that looked good