Electronics Questions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:48, 8 January 2010

Format: Page, Paragraph, Line.

Chapter 1

No. $R_{O}$ is in series with $R_{L}$ , so if $R_{L}$ gets smaller, there will be a smaller voltage drop over $R_{L}$ and a larger voltage drop over $R_{O}$

21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 '''Chapter 1'''
 #20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as <math>R_L</math> gets smaller?
+:* No.<math>R_O</math> is in series with <math>R_L</math>, so if <math>R_L</math> gets smaller, there will be a smaller voltage drop over <math>R_L</math> and a larger voltage drop over <math>R_O</math>
 #21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
 #31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?