Electronics Questions: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


'''Chapter 1'''
'''Chapter 1'''
#20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as <math>R_L</math> gets smaller?
*20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as <math>R_L</math> gets smaller?
:* No.<math>R_O</math> is in series with <math>R_L</math>, so if <math>R_L</math> gets smaller, there will be a smaller voltage drop over <math>R_L</math> and a larger voltage drop over <math>R_O</math>
:* No.<math>R_O</math> is in series with <math>R_L</math>, so if <math>R_L</math> gets smaller, there will be a smaller voltage drop over <math>R_L</math> and a larger voltage drop over <math>R_O</math>
#21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
*21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
:* The source impedance is simply to reflect the real world internal losses of the system. If you want to use these models, you will need to make a Thevenin or Norton equivalent.
#31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?
:* When you make the Thevnin or Norton equivalent of a circuit, you will find out how big these impedances are.
:* Loading effects are the impedances that reduce the voltage or current to the intended source. For F1.18, these are <math> R_s</math> and <math>R_o</math>, for F1.28, it is <math>R_o</math>
:* Yes! It depends on what part of the project you get to design. If you get to work on the pre-amplifier section, you can have small resistances (for a Thevenin equivalent) or high resistances (for a Norton equivalent). If you are designing the amplifier section, you can stick in a buffer amplifier in so that there is no voltage drop (due to no current) flowing into the amplifier. This ensures the voltage drop is completely across the load/input resistor.
*31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?

Revision as of 11:11, 8 January 2010

Format: Page, Paragraph, Line.

Chapter 1

  • 20,1,3: Shouldn't the output voltage get larger as gets smaller?
  • No. is in series with , so if gets smaller, there will be a smaller voltage drop over and a larger voltage drop over
  • 21, F1.18: Why does it have to have an source impedance? How big is this impedance? Loading effects? Could we get rid of this if we had superconducting wires?
  • The source impedance is simply to reflect the real world internal losses of the system. If you want to use these models, you will need to make a Thevenin or Norton equivalent.
  • When you make the Thevnin or Norton equivalent of a circuit, you will find out how big these impedances are.
  • Loading effects are the impedances that reduce the voltage or current to the intended source. For F1.18, these are and , for F1.28, it is
  • Yes! It depends on what part of the project you get to design. If you get to work on the pre-amplifier section, you can have small resistances (for a Thevenin equivalent) or high resistances (for a Norton equivalent). If you are designing the amplifier section, you can stick in a buffer amplifier in so that there is no voltage drop (due to no current) flowing into the amplifier. This ensures the voltage drop is completely across the load/input resistor.
  • 31,1,5: Why are the output resistances placed where they are? It seems there would be a voltage drop over the voltage amplifier and extra current not being accounted for in the current amplifier?