|
|
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
</center> |
|
</center> |
|
The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given <math>x(t)</math>, we may determine <math> \alpha_k </math> by taking the [[inner product]] of <math>\alpha_k</math> with <math>x(t)</math>. |
|
The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given <math>x(t)</math>, we may determine <math> \alpha_k </math> by taking the [[inner product]] of <math>\alpha_k</math> with <math>x(t)</math>. |
|
Let us assume a solution for <math>\alpha_k</math> of the form <math>e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}</math>. Now we take the inner product of <math>\alpha_k</math> with <math>x(t)</math>. |
|
Let us assume a solution for <math>\alpha_k</math> of the form <math>e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}</math>. Now we take the inner product of <math>\alpha_k</math> with <math>x(t)</math> over the interval of one period, <math> T </math>. |
|
<math> <\alpha_k|x(t)> = <e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}|\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T}> </math> |
|
<math> <\alpha_k|x(t)> = <e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}|\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T}> </math> |
|
<math>= \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(t)e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math> |
|
<math>= \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(t)e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math> |
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
<math> \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} e^ \frac {j 2 \pi (k-n) t}{T} dt = 0 </math> |
|
<math> \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} e^ \frac {j 2 \pi (k-n) t}{T} dt = 0 </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation. |
|
We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation. [[What is <math> \delta_{k,n} </math>?]] |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} e^ \frac {j 2 \pi (k-n) t}{T} dt = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty T \delta_{k,n} \alpha_k = T \alpha_n </math> |
|
<math> \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k \int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} e^ \frac {j 2 \pi (k-n) t}{T} dt = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty T \delta_{k,n} \alpha_k = T \alpha_n </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
So, we may conclude |
|
So, we conclude |
|
<math>\alpha_n = \frac{1}{T}\int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(t) e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math> |
|
<math>\alpha_n = \frac{1}{T}\int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(t) e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math> |
|
|
|
|
Fourier Series
If
- Dirichlet conditions are satisfied
then we can write
The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given , we may determine by taking the inner product of with .
Let us assume a solution for of the form . Now we take the inner product of with over the interval of one period, .
If then,
If then,
We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation. [[What is ?]]
So, we conclude
Orthogonal Functions
The function and are orthogonal on if and only if .
The set of functions are orthonormal if and only if .
Linear Systems
Let us say we have a linear time invarient system, where is the input and is the output. What outputs do we get as we put different inputs into this system?
File:Linear System.JPG
If we put in an impulse response, , then we get out . What would happen if we put a time delayed impulse signal () into the system. The output response would be a time delayed , or , because the system is time invarient. So, no matter when we put in our signal the response would come out the same.
What if we now multiplied our impulse by a coefficient? Since our system is linear the proportionality property applies. If we put into our system then we should get out .
By the superposition property(because we have a linear system) we may take the integral of and we get out . What would we get if we put into our system. We could find out by plugging in for in the integral that we just found the output for above. If we do a change of variables () we get . By pulling out of the integral and calling the remaining integral we get .
INPUT
|
OUTPUT
|
REASON
|
|
|
Given
|
|
|
Time Invarient
|
|
|
Proportionality
|
|
|
Superposition
|
|
|
Superposition
|
|
|
Superposition (from above)
|
Fourier Series (indepth)
I would like to take a closer look at in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of .
We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where is negative, zero, and positive.
Now, by substituting into the summation where is negative and substituting into the summation where is positive we get:
Recall that
If is real, then . Let us assume that is real.
Recall that Here is further clarification on this property
So, we may write:
Fourier Transform
Fourier transforms emerge because we want to be able to make Fourier expressions of non-periodic functions. We can take the limit of those non-periodic functions to get a fourier expression for the function.
Remember that:
So,
From the above limit we define and .
We can take the derivitive of and then put in terms of the reverse fourier transform.
What happens if we just shift the time of ?
In the same way, if we shift the frequency we get:
What would be the Fourier transform of ?
<
CD Player
Below is a diagram of how the information on a CD player is read and processed. As you can see the information on the CD is processed by the D/A converter and then sent through a low pass filter and on to the speaker. If you were recording sound, the sound would be captured through a microphone. Then, it should be sent through a low pass filter and onto the A/D converter and then it is ready to be put on the CD. Recording signals is essentially the reverse of the operation pictured below.
File:CDsystem.jpg
In Time Domain:
Let's start with a signal , as shown below. In this signal there is an infinite amount of information. Obviously, we can't hold it all in a computer, but we could take samples every . Lets do that by multiplying by . Since the magnetude of our delta function is one, we get a series of delta functions that record the value of at intervals of . This gives us a result that looks like:
In Frequency Domain:
In the frequency domain we start with . Now we are in frequency, so we must convolve instead of multiply like we did in the time domain. We would have to convolve with .
Aside:
This result looks it could be a fourier series. We would like to get our result in terms of delta functions. As shown below, the periodic delta functions could be represented as a fourier series with coefficients .
Now we can solve for .
Since the only delta function within the integration limits is the delta function at , we can take out the summation and just leave one delta function. Then, evaluating the integral at we get
File:Barnsasample.jpg
File:BarnsaDA.jpg