Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br> | Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br> | ||
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> | So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br> | ||
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job! | |||
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]] | Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]] | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br> | [[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br> | ||
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ | Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property. | ||
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] </math><br/>''' | |||
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as ''complex modulation''<br/> | |||
<math> | <math> | ||
\mathcal{F} \left[ | \mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt | ||
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left( \ | </math> | ||
Combining terms, we get: | |||
<math> | |||
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore, | |||
<br/> | |||
<math> | <math> | ||
\mathcal{F} \left[ | \mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0}) | ||
= | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE **** | |||
2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two: | |||
<math> | |||
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt | |||
</math> | |||
Rearranging terms we get: | |||
<math> | <math> | ||
\mathcal{F} \left[ | \mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt | ||
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty | </math> | ||
</math> | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Now lets make the substitution <math>\lambda = t-t_{0} \rightarrow t = \lambda + t_{0}</math>. | |||
<br/> | |||
This leads us to: | |||
<math> \mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty | <math> | ||
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt | |||
</math> | |||
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: | |||
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt | |||
We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: | |||
<math> | |||
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} | |||
</math> | |||
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE **** | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 15:09, 31 October 2009
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
So
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
But this is simply . Therefore,
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
2. Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall ,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather