Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>

-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!


Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
Line 25: Line 27:


[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br>
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br>
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_{0}} \,dt \right] </math><br/>'''
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] </math><br/>'''


This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as ''complex modulation''<br/>
To begin, we know that<br/>


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right) e^{-j2 \pi ft}\,dt
</math>
</math>
<br/>


After some factoring and combinting of like terms we get:
Combining terms, we get:


<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
</math>
<br/>
<br/>

But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore,
<br/>

<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left( \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} 10^{t}g(t) \,dt \right) e^{j2 \pi f(t_0-t)}\,dt
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>


**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
But recall that
<math>\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2 \pi f(t_{0}-t)} \,dt \equiv \delta (t_{0}-t) \mbox{ or } \delta (t-t_{0})</math>


2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:


<math>
Because of this definition (and some "math magic") our problem has been simplified significantly: <br/>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt
</math>

Rearranging terms we get:


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
</math>
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t) \delta (t-t_{0})\,dt = 10^{t_0}g(t_0)
</math>
<br/>
<br/>


Now lets make the substitution <math>\lambda = t-t_{0} \rightarrow t = \lambda + t_{0}</math>.
Therefore,
<br/>
This leads us to:


<math>
<math> \mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] = 10^{t_0}g(t_0) </math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt
</math>


After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:


\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt


We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get:
2.

<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}}
</math>


**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****


----
----

Revision as of 14:09, 31 October 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now

Note that

So

-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

Combining terms, we get:


But this is simply . Therefore,


        • PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****

2. Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:

Rearranging terms we get:


Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt

We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:

        • PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****

Joshua Sarris

Find


Recall ,

so expanding we have,


Also recall ,

so we can convert to exponentials.


Now integrating gives us,



So we now have the identity,

or rather

Reviewed by Max