HW 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Doing this assignment taught many new lessons, in both sampling and | Doing this assignment taught many new lessons, in both sampling and Octave. | ||
An infinite integral in Octave would be impractical. As a result, I did the following: | |||
* I made a vector "x" from -5 to 5 with points spaced every .02 in between. I originally made the vector from -10 to 10 with an even smaller spacing ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem] the Nyquist theorem requires that samples must be taken at at least twice the frequency), but the integral took too long. | |||
* I made a vector "y" equal to "x". | |||
* I used the meshgrid function in Octave to make my vectors square matrices ([http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/octave3/octave_159.html] more info here) | |||
[[File:HW3.png]] | [[File:HW3.png]] | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 13 October 2010
Doing this assignment taught many new lessons, in both sampling and Octave. An infinite integral in Octave would be impractical. As a result, I did the following:
- I made a vector "x" from -5 to 5 with points spaced every .02 in between. I originally made the vector from -10 to 10 with an even smaller spacing ([1] the Nyquist theorem requires that samples must be taken at at least twice the frequency), but the integral took too long.
- I made a vector "y" equal to "x".
- I used the meshgrid function in Octave to make my vectors square matrices ([2] more info here)
