|
|
Line 39: |
Line 39: |
|
I may come back to this latter... |
|
I may come back to this latter... |
|
|
|
|
|
==Fourier Series <math> (\alpha_k) </math>== |
|
==Fourier Series (indepth)== |
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to take a closer look at <math> \alpha_k </math> in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of <math> \alpha_k </math>. |
|
|
|
|
|
We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where <math> \alpha_k </math> is negative, zero, and positive. |
|
|
<math> \bold x(t) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T} = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1} \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T} + \alpha_0 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T}</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Now, by substituting <math> n = -k </math> into the summation where <math> k </math> is negative and substituting <math> n = k </math> into the summation where <math> k </math> is positive we get: |
|
|
<math> \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{-n} e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} + \alpha_0 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T} </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Recall that <math>\alpha_n = \frac{1}{T}\int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(u) e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
If <math> x(t) </math> is real, then <math> \alpha_n^* = \alpha_{-n} </math>. Let us assume that <math> x(t) </math> is real. |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> x(t) = \alpha_0 +\sum_{n=1}^\infty (\alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T} + \alpha_n^* e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T}) </math> |
|
|
|
|
|
Recall that <math> y + y^* = 2Re(y) </math> [[Here is further clarification on this property]] |
|
|
|
|
|
So, we may write: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> x(t) = \alpha_0 +\sum_{n=1}^\infty 2Re(\alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}) </math> |
Revision as of 12:00, 16 October 2005
Fourier Series
If
- Dirichlet conditions are satisfied
then we can write
The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given , we may determine by taking the inner product of with .
Let us assume a solution for of the form . Now we take the inner product of with .
If then,
If then,
We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation.
So, we may conclude
Orthogonal Functions
The function and are orthogonal on if and only if .
The set of functions are orthonormal if and only if .
Linear Systems
I may come back to this latter...
Fourier Series (indepth)
I would like to take a closer look at in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of .
We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where is negative, zero, and positive.
Now, by substituting into the summation where is negative and substituting into the summation where is positive we get:
Recall that
If is real, then . Let us assume that is real.
Recall that Here is further clarification on this property
So, we may write: