Fourier series - by Ray Betz: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
I may come back to this latter...
I may come back to this latter...


==Fourier Series <math> (\alpha_k) </math>==
==Fourier Series (indepth)==

I would like to take a closer look at <math> \alpha_k </math> in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of <math> \alpha_k </math>.

We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where <math> \alpha_k </math> is negative, zero, and positive.
<math> \bold x(t) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T} = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1} \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T} + \alpha_0 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_k e^ \frac {j 2 \pi k t}{T}</math>

Now, by substituting <math> n = -k </math> into the summation where <math> k </math> is negative and substituting <math> n = k </math> into the summation where <math> k </math> is positive we get:
<math> \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{-n} e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} + \alpha_0 + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T} </math>

Recall that <math>\alpha_n = \frac{1}{T}\int_{-\frac{T}{2}}^\frac{T}{2} x(u) e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T} dt </math>

If <math> x(t) </math> is real, then <math> \alpha_n^* = \alpha_{-n} </math>. Let us assume that <math> x(t) </math> is real.

<math> x(t) = \alpha_0 +\sum_{n=1}^\infty (\alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T} + \alpha_n^* e^ \frac {-j 2 \pi n t}{T}) </math>

Recall that <math> y + y^* = 2Re(y) </math> [[Here is further clarification on this property]]

So, we may write:

<math> x(t) = \alpha_0 +\sum_{n=1}^\infty 2Re(\alpha_n e^ \frac {j 2 \pi n t}{T}) </math>

Revision as of 12:00, 16 October 2005

Fourier Series

If

  1. Dirichlet conditions are satisfied

then we can write

The above equation is called the complex fourier series. Given , we may determine by taking the inner product of with . Let us assume a solution for of the form . Now we take the inner product of with .

If then,

If then,

We can simplify the above two conclusion into one equation.

So, we may conclude

Orthogonal Functions

The function and are orthogonal on if and only if .

The set of functions are orthonormal if and only if .

Linear Systems

I may come back to this latter...

Fourier Series (indepth)

I would like to take a closer look at in the Fourier Series. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of .

We will seperate x(t) into three parts; where is negative, zero, and positive.

Now, by substituting into the summation where is negative and substituting into the summation where is positive we get:

Recall that

If is real, then . Let us assume that is real.

Recall that Here is further clarification on this property

So, we may write: