Laplace transforms:Series RLC circuit: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:
which is our answer.
which is our answer.


===Initial/Final Value Theorems===
We now want to use the Initial and Final Value Theorems on this problem.


The Initial Value Theorem states that
<math>\lim_{s \to \infty}sF(s)=f(0^+)</math>
<math> \Rightarrow \lim_{s \to \infty}\dfrac{s^3}{(s^2+400)(0.01s^2+s+10000)}=i(0) </math>
<math> \Rightarrow  i(0)=0 </math>
In addition, when we actually evaluate <math>i(0)</math> from our equation for <math>i(t)</math>, we find it to be 0 as well.  So, things check out there.
The Final Value Theorem states that
<math> \lim_{s \to 0}sF(s)=f(\infty)</math>
<math> \Rightarrow \lim_{s \to 0}\dfrac{s^3}{(s^2+400)(0.01s^2+s+10000)}=i(\infty) </math>
<math> \Rightarrow i(\infty)=0</math>
This time, when we actually evaluate ''i''(&infin;) from the equation for <math>i(t)</math>, we find it to be undefined.  So here, the Final Value Theorem tells us something that is not necessarily true (in fact, because we have oscillating functions, we know that ''i''(&infin;) will not be zero).
----
----


Written by Nathan Reeves ~ Checked by
Written by Nathan Reeves ~ Checked by

Revision as of 15:12, 22 October 2009

Laplace Transform Example: Series RLC Circuit

Problem

Given a series RLC circuit with R=10Ohms, L=0.1H, and C=105F, having power source v(t)=10cos(20t), find an expression for i(t) if i(0)=0A and vc(0)=0V.

Solution

We begin with the general formula for voltage drops around the circuit:

v(t)=Ri+Ldidt+1Cidt

Substituting numbers, we get

10cos(20t)=10i+0.1didt+105idt

cos(20t)=i+0.01didt+10000idt

Now, we take the Laplace Transform and get

ss2+202=I+0.01[sIi(0)]+10000Is

Using the fact that i(0)=0A, we get

ss2+400=I+0.01sI+10000Is

s2s2+400=sI+0.01s2I+10000I

s2s2+400=(0.01s2+s+10000)I

I(s)=s2(s2+400)(0.01s2+s+10000)

Using partial fraction decomposition, we find that

I(s)=1.00044.003*108s0.01s2+s+10000+4.003*106s0.04002s2+400

I(s)=100.044.003*106ss2+100s+1000000+4.003*106s0.04002s2+400

I(s)=100.044.003*106s(s+50)2+997500+4.003*106s0.04002s2+400

I(s)=100.038(s+50)2+(50399)24.003*106s+.002(s+50)2+(50399)2+4.003*106ss2+2020.04002s2+202

I(s)=10.0385039950399(s+50)2+(50399)24.003*106s+50(s+50)2+(50399)2+4.003*106ss2+2020.040022020s2+202

Finally, we take the inverse Laplace transform to obtain

i(t)=0.01e50tsin(998.8t)(4.003*106)e50tcos(998.8t)+(4.003*106)cos(20t)0.002sin(20t)

which is our answer.

Initial/Final Value Theorems

We now want to use the Initial and Final Value Theorems on this problem.

The Initial Value Theorem states that

limssF(s)=f(0+)

limss3(s2+400)(0.01s2+s+10000)=i(0)

i(0)=0

In addition, when we actually evaluate i(0) from our equation for i(t), we find it to be 0 as well. So, things check out there.

The Final Value Theorem states that

lims0sF(s)=f()

lims0s3(s2+400)(0.01s2+s+10000)=i()

i()=0

This time, when we actually evaluate i(∞) from the equation for i(t), we find it to be undefined. So here, the Final Value Theorem tells us something that is not necessarily true (in fact, because we have oscillating functions, we know that i(∞) will not be zero).


Written by Nathan Reeves ~ Checked by