Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!


Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
Reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
Line 25: Line 27:


[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br>
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br><br>
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_{0}} \,dt \right] </math><br/>'''
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] </math><br/>'''


To begin, we know that<br/>
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as ''complex modulation''<br/>


<math>  
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]  
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right) e^{-j2 \pi ft}\,dt
</math>
 
Combining terms, we get:
 
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>


After some factoring and combinting of like terms we get:
But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore,
<br/>


<br/>
<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left( \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} 10^{t}g(t) \,dt \right) e^{j2 \pi f(t_0-t)}\,dt 
</math>
</math>
<br/>
<br/>


But recall that
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
<math>\int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2 \pi f(t_{0}-t)} \,dt \equiv \delta (t_{0}-t) \mbox{ or } \delta (t-t_{0})</math>
 
2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:


<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt
</math>


Because of this definition (and some "math magic") our problem has been simplified significantly: <br/>
Rearranging terms we get:


<math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right]
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt
= \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t) \delta (t-t_{0})\,dt = 10^{t_0}g(t_0)
</math>
</math>  
<br/>
<br/>


Therefore,
Now lets make the substitution <math>\lambda = t-t_{0} \rightarrow t = \lambda + t_{0}</math>.
<br/>
This leads us to:


<math> \mathcal{F} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}10^{t}g(t)e^{j2 \pi ft_0} \,dt \right] = 10^{t_0}g(t_0) </math>
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt
</math>
 
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:


\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt


We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get:


2.
<math>
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}}
</math>


**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****


----
----

Revision as of 15:09, 31 October 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]
Recall w0=2πf0, so ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]=ℱ[cos(2πf0t)g(t)]=∫−∞∞cos(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt
Also recall cos(θ)=12(ejθ+e−jθ),so ∫−∞∞cos(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞12[ej2πf0t+e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt
Now ∫−∞∞12[ej2πf0t+e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt=12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f−f0)tg(t)dt+12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f+f0)tg(t)dt=12G(f−f0)+12G(f+f0)
So ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]=12[G(f−f0)+G(f+f0)]


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]
Recall g(t)=ℱ−1[G(f)]=∫−∞∞G(f)ej2πftdf
Similarly, h(t)=ℱ−1[H(f)]=∫−∞∞H(f)ej2πftdf
So ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]=∫−∞∞∫−∞∞G(f')ej2πf'tdf'(∫−∞∞H(f'′)ej2πf'′tdf'′)*dt
Now ∫−∞∞∫−∞∞G(f')ej2πf'tdf'(∫−∞∞H(f'′)ej2πf'′tdf'′)*dt=∫−∞∞G(f')∫−∞∞H*(f'′)∫−∞∞ej2π(f'′−f')tdtdf'′df'

Note that ∫−∞∞ej2π(f'′−f')tdt=δ(f'′−f')

So ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]=∫−∞∞G(f)H*(f)df

-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞[g(t)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt

Combining terms, we get:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞g(t)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt

But this is simply G(f′) where f′=f−f0. Therefore,

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=G(f−f0)

        • PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****

2. Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:

ℱ[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt

Rearranging terms we get:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞g(t−t0)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt

Now lets make the substitution λ=t−t0→t=λ+t0.
This leads us to:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)(λ+t0dt

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt

We know that the exponential in terms of t0 is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=G(f−f0)e−j2π(f−f0)t0

        • PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****

Joshua Sarris

Find ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]


Recall w0=2πf0,

so expanding we have,

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=ℱ[sin(2πf0t)g(t)]=∫−∞∞sin(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt

Also recall sin(θ)=1j2(ejθ−e−jθ),

so we can convert to exponentials.

∫−∞∞sin(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞1j2[ej2πf0t−e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt

Now integrating gives us,

∫−∞∞1j2[ej2πf0t−e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt=1j2∫−∞∞e−j2π(f−f0)tg(t)dt−12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f+f0)tg(t)dt=1j2G(f−f0)−1j2G(f+f0)


So we now have the identity,

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=1j2[G(f−f0)−G(f+f0)]

or rather

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=12j[G(f+f0)+G(f−f0)]

Reviewed by Max