|
|
Line 40: |
Line 40: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt |
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt |
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
But this is simply <math> G(f') \mbox{ where } f'=f-f_{0}</math>. Therefore,
|
|
Now let's make the following substitution <math> \displaystyle \theta = f-f_{0}</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
⚫ |
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g( t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0}) t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g( t)e^{-j2 \pi \ theta t} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
This looks just like <math> \displaystyle G(\theta )</math>! |
|
|
|
|
|
We can now conclude that: |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0}) |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(\theta ) = G(f-f_{0}) |
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
|
|
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE''' |
|
|
|
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
2. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right]</math><br/>''' |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
-- Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two ... |
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By definition we know that: |
⚫ |
2. Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
Line 63: |
Line 83: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt |
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt |
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
<br/> |
|
<br/> |
Line 72: |
Line 92: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
|
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt |
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt |
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: |
|
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
⚫ |
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g( \lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0}) (\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g( \lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\ lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt |
|
|
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get: |
⚫ |
We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
|
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt = e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } \,dt \right] |
|
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
We know that the exponential in terms of <math> \displaystyle t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: |
|
|
|
|
|
<math> |
|
<math> |
Line 85: |
Line 113: |
|
</math> |
|
</math> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<br/> |
⚫ |
**** PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE **** |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ''' |
|
|
|
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
<br/> |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
---- |
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
So
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
Now let's make the following substitution
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:
This looks just like !
We can now conclude that:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
2. Find
-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
By definition we know that:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall
,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather
Reviewed by Max