Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\ | \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Now let's make the following substitution <math> \displaystyle \theta = f-f_{0}</math> | |||
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function: | |||
<math> | |||
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t)e^{-j2 \pi \theta t} \,dt | |||
</math> | |||
<br/> | |||
This looks just like <math> \displaystyle G(\theta )</math>! | |||
We can now conclude that: | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(f-f_{0}) | \mathcal{F} \left[ g(t)e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] = G(\theta ) = G(f-f_{0}) | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | |||
<br/> | |||
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE''' | |||
<br/> | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
2. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right]</math><br/>''' | |||
-- Using the above definition of ''complex modulation'' and the definition from class of a ''time delay'' (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two... | |||
<br/> | |||
By definition we know that: | |||
<math> | <math> | ||
Line 63: | Line 83: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\ | \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \left[ g(t-t_{0})e^{j2 \pi f_{0}t} \right] e^{-j2 \pi ft} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Line 72: | Line 92: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\ | \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(t-t_{0})e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: | After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get: | ||
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt | <math> | ||
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0})} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt | |||
</math> | |||
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get: | |||
<math> | |||
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt = e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \left[ \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda } \,dt \right] | |||
</math> | |||
We know that the exponential in terms of <math>t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: | We know that the exponential in terms of <math>\displaystyle t_{0}</math> is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of ''complex modualtion'', we finally get: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
Line 85: | Line 113: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
<br/> | |||
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE''' | |||
<br/> | |||
<br/> | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 15:35, 31 October 2009
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
So
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
Now let's make the following substitution
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:
This looks just like !
We can now conclude that:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
2. Find
-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
By definition we know that:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall ,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather