Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 142: Line 142:
<math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}sin(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}-e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br>
<math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}sin(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}-e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br>


Now integrating gives us,
Now integrating gives us, ''(<math> ** </math> I believe you are missing 'j' in the denominator of the second term)''


<math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}-e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \frac{1}{j2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f-f_0)t}g(t)dt-\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f+f_0)t}g(t)dt = \frac{1}{j2}G(f-f_0)- \frac{1}{j2}G(f+f_0)\!</math><br>
<math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}-e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \frac{1}{j2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f-f_0)t}g(t)dt-\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f+f_0)t}g(t)dt = \frac{1}{j2}G(f-f_0)- \frac{1}{j2}G(f+f_0)\!</math><br>
Line 156: Line 156:


[[Fourier Transform Property review|Reviewed by Max]]
[[Fourier Transform Property review|Reviewed by Max]]
Also reviewed by [[Nick Christman]]
-- Looks good. I found one typo (I think), see <math> ** </math>. Good job Josh!

Revision as of 17:26, 31 October 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]
Recall w0=2πf0, so ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]=ℱ[cos(2πf0t)g(t)]=∫−∞∞cos(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt
Also recall cos(θ)=12(ejθ+e−jθ),so ∫−∞∞cos(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞12[ej2πf0t+e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt
Now ∫−∞∞12[ej2πf0t+e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt=12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f−f0)tg(t)dt+12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f+f0)tg(t)dt=12G(f−f0)+12G(f+f0)
So ℱ[cos(w0t)g(t)]=12[G(f−f0)+G(f+f0)]


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]
Recall g(t)=ℱ−1[G(f)]=∫−∞∞G(f)ej2πftdf
Similarly, h(t)=ℱ−1[H(f)]=∫−∞∞H(f)ej2πftdf
So ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]=∫−∞∞∫−∞∞G(f')ej2πf'tdf'(∫−∞∞H(f'′)ej2πf'′tdf'′)*dt
Now ∫−∞∞∫−∞∞G(f')ej2πf'tdf'(∫−∞∞H(f'′)ej2πf'′tdf'′)*dt=∫−∞∞G(f')∫−∞∞H*(f'′)∫−∞∞ej2π(f'′−f')tdtdf'′df'

Note that ∫−∞∞ej2π(f'′−f')tdt=δ(f'′−f')

So ℱ[∫−∞∞g(t)h*(t)dt]=∫−∞∞G(f)H*(f)df

"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"

Example: ∫a1a2∫b1b2X(s′)Y(s″)δ(s″−s′)ds′ds″=∫a1a2X(s′)Y(s′)ds′

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞[g(t)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt

Combining terms, we get:

∫−∞∞[g(t)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞g(t)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt

Now let's make the following substitution θ=f−f0

This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:

∫−∞∞g(t)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt=∫−∞∞g(t)e−j2πθtdt

This looks just like G(θ)!

We can now conclude that:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=G(θ)=G(f−f0)

PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE



2. Find ℱ[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]

-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...

By definition we know that:

ℱ[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]=∫−∞∞[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt

Rearranging terms we get:

∫−∞∞[g(t−t0)ej2πf0t]e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞g(t−t0)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt

Now lets make the substitution λ=t−t0→t=λ+t0.
This leads us to:

∫−∞∞g(t−t0)e−j2π(f−f0)tdt=∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)(λ+t0)dt

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)(λ+t0)dt=∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)λe−j2π(f−f0)t0dt

Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:

∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)λe−j2π(f−f0)t0dt=e−j2π(f−f0)t0[∫−∞∞g(λ)e−j2π(f−f0)λdt]

We know that the exponential in terms of t0 is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:

ℱ[g(t)ej2πf0t]=G(f−f0)e−j2π(f−f0)t0


PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE




Joshua Sarris

Find ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]


Recall w0=2πf0,

so expanding we have,

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=ℱ[sin(2πf0t)g(t)]=∫−∞∞sin(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt

Also recall sin(θ)=1j2(ejθ−e−jθ),

so we can convert to exponentials.

∫−∞∞sin(2πf0t)g(t)e−j2πftdt=∫−∞∞1j2[ej2πf0t−e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt

Now integrating gives us, (** I believe you are missing 'j' in the denominator of the second term)

∫−∞∞1j2[ej2πf0t−e−j2πf0t]g(t)e−j2πftdt=1j2∫−∞∞e−j2π(f−f0)tg(t)dt−12∫−∞∞e−j2π(f+f0)tg(t)dt=1j2G(f−f0)−1j2G(f+f0)


So we now have the identity,

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=1j2[G(f−f0)−G(f+f0)]

or rather

ℱ[sin(w0t)g(t)]=12j[G(f+f0)+G(f−f0)]

Reviewed by Max

Also reviewed by Nick Christman -- Looks good. I found one typo (I think), see **. Good job Josh!