Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions

From Class Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


[[Max Woesner|<b><u>Max Woesner</u></b>]]<br><br>
[[Max Woesner|<b><u>Max Woesner</u></b>]]<br><br>
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)]\!</math><br>'''
1. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)]\!</math><br><br>'''
Recall <math> w_0 = 2\pi f_0\!</math>, so <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)] = \mathcal{F}[cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br>
Recall <math> w_0 = 2\pi f_0\!</math>, so <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)] = \mathcal{F}[cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br><br>
Also recall <math> cos(\theta) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{j\theta} + e^{-j\theta})\!</math>,so <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}+e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br>
Also recall <math> cos(\theta) = \frac{1}{2}(e^{j\theta} + e^{-j\theta})\!</math>,so <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}cos(2\pi f_0t)g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}+e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt\!</math><br><br>
Now <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}+e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f-f_0)t}g(t)dt+\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f+f_0)t}g(t)dt = \frac{1}{2}G(f-f_0)+ \frac{1}{2}G(f+f_0)\!</math><br>
Now <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2}[e^{j2\pi f_0t}+e^{-j2\pi f_0t}]g(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f-f_0)t}g(t)dt \ + \ \frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-j2\pi (f+f_0)t}g(t)dt = \frac{1}{2}G(f-f_0) \ + \ \frac{1}{2}G(f+f_0)\!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)] = \frac{1}{2}[G(f-f_0)+ G(f+f_0)]\!</math><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}[cos(w_0t)g(t)] = \frac{1}{2}[G(f-f_0)+ G(f+f_0)]\!</math><br><br>


Line 12: Line 12:




2. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg]\!</math><br>'''
2. '''Find <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg]\!</math><br><br>'''
Recall <math> g(t)= \mathcal{F}^{-1}[G(f)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)e^{j2\pi ft}df\!</math><br>
Recall <math> g(t)= \mathcal{F}^{-1}[G(f)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)e^{j2\pi ft}df\!</math><br>
Similarly, <math> h(t)= \mathcal{F}^{-1}[H(f)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H(f)e^{j2\pi ft}df\!</math><br>
Similarly, <math> h(t)= \mathcal{F}^{-1}[H(f)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H(f)e^{j2\pi ft}df\!</math><br>
Line 18: Line 18:
Now <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')e^{j2\pi f^'t}df^' \Bigg(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H(f^{''})e^{j2\pi f^{''}t}df^{''}\Bigg)^* dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt df^{''} df^' \!</math><br><br>
Now <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')e^{j2\pi f^'t}df^' \Bigg(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H(f^{''})e^{j2\pi f^{''}t}df^{''}\Bigg)^* dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt df^{''} df^' \!</math><br><br>
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
Note that <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt = \delta (f^{''}-f^') \!</math><br><br>
<i>Added step per Nick's suggestion</i><br><br>
So <math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>
Substituting gives us <math>\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi (f^{''}-f^')t}dt df^{''} df^' = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\delta (f^{''}-f^') df^{''} df^' \!</math><br><br>
And <math> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}H^*(f^{''})\delta (f^{''}-f^') df^{''} df^' = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f^')H^*(f^')df^' \!</math><br><br>
Since <math> f^' \!</math> is a simply a dummy variable, we can conclude that: <br><br>
<math>\mathcal{F}\bigg[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(t) h^*(t) dt\bigg] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}G(f)H^*(f)df \!</math><br><br>


"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"

Revision as of 08:41, 3 November 2009

Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....

Max Woesner

1. Find

Recall , so

Also recall ,so

Now

So


reviewed by Joshua Sarris


2. Find

Recall
Similarly,
So
Now

Note that

Added step per Nick's suggestion

Substituting gives us

And

Since is a simply a dummy variable, we can conclude that:



"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"

Example:

Reviewed by Nick Christman


Nick Christman

Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.

1. Find

This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation

Combining terms, we get:


Now let's make the following substitution

This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:


This looks just like !

We can now conclude that:



PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE



2. Find

-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...

By definition we know that:

Rearranging terms we get:


Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:

After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:

Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:

We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:


PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE




Joshua Sarris

Find


Recall ,

so expanding we have,


Also recall ,

so we can convert to exponentials.


Now integrating gives us, ( I believe you are missing 'j' in the denominator of the second term)



So we now have the identity,

or rather

Reviewed by Max

Also reviewed by Nick Christman -- Looks good. I found one typo (I think), see . Good job Josh!