Homework Eight: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Image:x_frequency2a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 4: x(nT) written as impulses for sampling purposes in the frequency domain]] |
[[Image:x_frequency2a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 4: x(nT) written as impulses for sampling purposes in the frequency domain]] |
||
As one may suspect, in order to get a more accurate function you must take more data points -- in other words, a higher sampling rate (i.e. 2x, 8x, etc. oversampling) leads to a more accurate collection of data. For this case, we are asked to looked a digital sampling, or 1x oversampling. In order to accomplish this, we will convolve our function from above with a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR filter). Let's call |
As one may suspect, in order to get a more accurate function you must take more data points -- in other words, a higher sampling rate (i.e. 2x, 8x, etc. oversampling) leads to a more accurate collection of data. For this case, we are asked to looked a digital sampling, or 1x oversampling. In order to accomplish this, we will convolve our function from above with a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR filter). Let's call the FIR g(t) and define it as <math>\sum_{-M}^{M}g(\frac{mT}{p})\delta (t-\frac{mT}{p}) </math> where <math>\scriptstyle p</math> is the oversampling rate. In our case <math>\scriptstyle p = 1</math>. Because we are dealing with digital sampling, the convolution will result in the original function ['''Figure 5''']. It is fairly easy to see that in the frequency domain, the FIR filter will be expressed as <math> G(f) = \sum_{-M}^{M}g(mT)e^{-j2 \pi mT}</math> ['''Figure 6''']. |
||
[[Image:x_discrete_a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 5: |
[[Image:x_discrete_a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 5: FIR filter in time domain, g(t)]] |
||
[[Image:x_frequency3a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 6: FIR filter in frequency domain, G(f)]] |
|||
As we know, convolution in the time domain results in multiplication in the frequency domain. The results of the convolution and multiplication of the before mentioned FIR filter (time, frequency) are shown below: |
|||
[[Image:x_discrete_a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 7: Original function, x(nT), convolved with the FIR filter, g(t)]] |
|||
[[Image:x_frequency4a.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 8: Original function multiplied by the FIR filter in frequency domain]] |
Revision as of 19:30, 8 November 2009
How does a CD player work with no oversampling, but digital filtering (1x oversampling)?
Recall that when the audio for a music CD is produced it has an infinite amount of data points which can be expressed as in the time domain [Figure 1] and in the frequency domain [Figure 2].
When one wants to store the data of (i.e. reading the data onto a CD in this case) an infinite number of data points is not ideal -- in fact, it is impossible. Therefore, we must sample the data at the (typical) rate of . This will give us a periodic function which we will call is the sampling period. It is common to allow a sampling rate of twice the frequency at which a human can hear (i.e. 2 x 22 kHz) -- that means, kHz.
Recall from class that in order to sample the original function, , we need to use a delta function. In other words, the continuous function of can be written as [Figure 3]. As one may expect, in the frequency domain we should get the same plot as in Figure 2, but it should repeat. In the frequency domain, this can be expressed as [Figure 4].
As one may suspect, in order to get a more accurate function you must take more data points -- in other words, a higher sampling rate (i.e. 2x, 8x, etc. oversampling) leads to a more accurate collection of data. For this case, we are asked to looked a digital sampling, or 1x oversampling. In order to accomplish this, we will convolve our function from above with a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR filter). Let's call the FIR g(t) and define it as where is the oversampling rate. In our case . Because we are dealing with digital sampling, the convolution will result in the original function [Figure 5]. It is fairly easy to see that in the frequency domain, the FIR filter will be expressed as [Figure 6].
As we know, convolution in the time domain results in multiplication in the frequency domain. The results of the convolution and multiplication of the before mentioned FIR filter (time, frequency) are shown below: