Homework Eight: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br/> |
[[Nick Christman|<b><u>Nick Christman</u></b>]]<br/> |
||
---- |
---- |
||
'''''First and foremost, I'd like to give credit to [[Max Woesner]] for the edited class images.''''' |
|||
Recall that when the audio for a music CD is produced it has an infinite amount of data points which can be expressed as <math>\scriptstyle x(t)</math> in the time domain ['''Figure 1'''] and <math>\scriptstyle X(f)</math> in the frequency domain ['''Figure 2''']. |
Recall that when the audio for a music CD is produced it has an infinite amount of data points which can be expressed as <math>\scriptstyle x(t)</math> in the time domain ['''Figure 1'''] and <math>\scriptstyle X(f)</math> in the frequency domain ['''Figure 2''']. |
||
Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
[[Image:lowpass_G_f.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 14: Low pass filter in the frequency domain]] |
[[Image:lowpass_G_f.jpg |thumb|center|upright=2|Figure 14: Low pass filter in the frequency domain]] |
||
This is how digital |
This is how a CD player using digital filtering instead of oversampling would operate -- our final signal should now be the audio we desire. |
||
---- |
|||
--[[User:Nicholas.Christman|Nicholas.Christman]] 04:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 8 November 2009
How does a CD player work with no oversampling, but digital filtering (1x oversampling)?
First and foremost, I'd like to give credit to Max Woesner for the edited class images.
Recall that when the audio for a music CD is produced it has an infinite amount of data points which can be expressed as in the time domain [Figure 1] and in the frequency domain [Figure 2].
When one wants to store the data of (i.e. reading the data onto a CD in this case) an infinite number of data points is not ideal -- in fact, it is impossible. Therefore, we must sample the data at the (typical) rate of . This will give us a periodic function which we will call is the sampling period. It is common to allow a sampling rate of twice the frequency at which a human can hear (i.e. 2 x 22 kHz) -- that means, kHz.
Recall from class that in order to sample the original function, , we need to use a delta function. In other words, the continuous function of can be written as [Figure 3]. As one may expect, in the frequency domain we should get the same plot as in Figure 2, but it should repeat. In the frequency domain, this can be expressed as [Figure 4].
As one may suspect, in order to get a more accurate function you must take more data points -- in other words, a higher sampling rate (i.e. 2x, 8x, etc. oversampling) leads to a more accurate collection of data. For this case, we are asked to looked a digital sampling, or 1x oversampling. In order to accomplish this, we will convolve our function from above with a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR filter). Let's call the FIR g(t) and define it as where is the oversampling rate. In our case . Because we are dealing with digital sampling, the convolution will result in the original function [Figure 5]. It is fairly easy to see that in the frequency domain, the FIR filter will be expressed as [Figure 6].
As we know, convolution in the time domain results in multiplication in the frequency domain. The results of the convolution and multiplication of the before mentioned FIR filter (time, frequency) are shown below:
At this point, we are ready to send the audio signal through a D/A converter -- which will essentially convolve the signal with a pulse function, say p(t). The pulse function is shown in the time domain [Figure 9] and the frequency domain [Figure 10]
Note: P(f) is Tsinc(fT)
The convolution of the pulse function with the above FIR filtered function in the time domain [Figure 11] and the frequency domain [Figure 12] can be expressed as and , respectively.
We are now very close to having the audio that we want -- now it would be good to run the signal through a low-pass filter to eliminate any high-frequency interference. As usual, we will convolve in time and multiply in frequency. The low pass filter in the time domain [Figure 13] and frequency domain [Figure 14] are shown below
This is how a CD player using digital filtering instead of oversampling would operate -- our final signal should now be the audio we desire.
--Nicholas.Christman 04:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)