HW 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:12, 13 October 2010

Doing this assignment taught many new lessons, in both sampling and Octave. An infinite integral in Octave would be impractical. As a result, I did the following:

I made a vector "x" from -5 to 5 with points spaced every .02 in between. I originally made the vector from -10 to 10 with an even smaller spacing (the Nyquist theorem requires that samples must be taken at at least twice the frequency), but the integral took too long.
I made a vector "y" equal to "x".
I used the meshgrid function in Octave to make my vectors square matrices (more info here)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Doing this assignment taught many new lessons, in both sampling and Octave.
 An infinite integral in Octave would be impractical. As a result, I did the following:
-* I made a vector "x" from -5 to 5 with points spaced every .02 in between. I originally made the vector from -10 to 10 with an even smaller spacing ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem] the Nyquist theorem requires that samples must be taken at at least twice the frequency), but the integral took too long.
+* I made a vector "x" from -5 to 5 with points spaced every .02 in between. I originally made the vector from -10 to 10 with an even smaller spacing ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem the Nyquist theorem] requires that samples must be taken at at least twice the frequency), but the integral took too long.
 * I made a vector "y" equal to "x".
-* I used the meshgrid function in Octave to make my vectors square matrices ([http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/octave3/octave_159.html] more info here)
+* I used the meshgrid function in Octave to make my vectors square matrices ([http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/octave3/octave_159.html more info here])
 [[File:HW3.png]]

HW 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:12, 13 October 2010

Navigation menu

Search