Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
So
-- I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. Good job!
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
But this is simply . Therefore,
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
2. Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will show a hybrid of the two:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
\int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})(\lambda + t_{0}} \,dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} g(\lambda )e^{-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})\lambda} e^-j2 \pi (f-f_{0})t_{0}} \,dt
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
- PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE ****
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall
,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us,
So we now have the identity,
or rather
Reviewed by Max