Fourier Transform Properties: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE''' <br><br><br> | '''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE''' <br><br><br> | ||
2. Find <math>\mathcal{F} | 2. Find <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] </math><br> | ||
First <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} </math><br> | |||
or rearranging we get <math> \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)e^{-j2\pi ft}dt = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}s(t)e^{j2\pi t(f_0 -f)}dt</math><br> | |||
Which leads to <math> \int_{- \infty}^{\infty}s(t)e^{j2\pi t(f_0 -f)}dt = S(f-f_0)</math><br> | |||
So <math>\mathcal{F}\left[e^{j2\pi f_0t}s(t)\right] = S(f-f_0) </math><br><br><br> | |||
'''PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE'''<BR><BR><BR> |
Revision as of 22:31, 7 November 2009
Some properties to choose from if you are having difficulty....
Max Woesner
1. Find
Recall , so
Also recall ,so
Now
So
reviewed by Joshua Sarris
2. Find
Recall
Similarly,
So
Now
Note that
Added step per Nick's suggestion
Substituting gives us
And
Since is a simply a dummy variable, we can conclude that:
"I was going to make a comment on the delta identity, but after looking at it closer I think it is fine. One comment I have is that you might consider adding one more step, showing the delta function in the integral and pulling the integrands together to make it look like a double integral -- it isn't necessary and I understood the transition, but it helps the proof/identity look a little more complete. Good job!"
Example:
Reviewed by Nick Christman
Nick Christman
Note: After scratching my head for a couple of hours, I decided that I would try a different Fourier Property. In fact, I chose a property that would need to be defined in order to show my second property.
1. Find
This is a fairly straightforward property and is known as complex modulation
Combining terms, we get:
Now let's make the following substitution
This now gives us a surprisingly familiar function:
This looks just like !
We can now conclude that:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
2. Find
-- Using the above definition of complex modulation and the definition from class of a time delay (a.k.a "the slacker function"), I will attempt to show a hybrid of the two...
By definition we know that:
Rearranging terms we get:
Now lets make the substitution .
This leads us to:
After some simplification and rearranging terms, we get:
Rearranging the terms yet again, we get:
We know that the exponential in terms of is simply a constant and because of the Fourier Property of complex modualtion, we finally get:
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
Joshua Sarris
Find
Recall
,
so expanding we have,
Also recall ,
so we can convert to exponentials.
Now integrating gives us, ( I believe you are missing 'j' in the denominator of the second term)
So we now have the identity,
or rather
Also reviewed by Nick Christman
-- Looks good. I found one typo (I think), see . Good job Josh!
Kevin Starkey
1. Find
First we know that
We also know that
Which gives us
Since is only non-zero at f = 0 this yeilds
So
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE
2. Find
First
or rearranging we get
Which leads to
So
PLEASE ENTER PEER REVIEW HERE